Health Insurance, Capitol Hill & Blogs, Pt.8 – Is ‘across
state lines’ adequate?
Previous…
More suggestions come from blogger ‘Something Beside More
Government!!’, who apparently promotes creating ‘affordability’
of health insurance/care by promoting no government
intervention at all. “Something’s” suggestions are now listed:
1. ‘Let consumers buy health insurance across state lines.’
2. ‘Rein in the medical malpractice attorneys.’
3. ‘Reduce the complexity of health insurance (for example,
have it function more like car insurance where you don’t expect
the insurance company to pay for gas and oil changes).’
4. ‘Scale back the crazy Stark regulations and let
entrepreneurial physicians find new ways to provide medical
care.’
5. ‘Encourage more patient-physician transactions where there
isn’t a third party.’
(1) Treating item #1 first, while allowing the health
insurance industry to disregard state mandated consumer
protections to increase ‘Friedmanistic’ competition in a
capitalistic marketplace, premium rates would, inevitable,
fall. But, if our ultimate objective is to raise our nation’s
status to the standard of all the other industrialized nations,
then we must consider the plight of our 25 million Americans
who are ‘underinsured’. It has been proven that many of these
people would be better off with no health insurance than the
inadequate health insurance they are paying for.
By allowing health insurance to be scaled back to
inadequacy, as Florida has done (see”
Fla. Health Insurance Flops Fast”),
we are encouraging the ‘free-riding’ practice that Mr. Wyden
and Mr. Romney are, rightly, so much against. With no
regulation, this is what you get. (For a detailed look at the
magnitude of the ‘underinsured’ problem, please refer to the
article series entitled “Major
'Underinsured' Sector”.)
Continued…
|
|
|
InsureMe |
- Home, Life & Health
- Free Quotes
- Apply in Minutes |
| |
|
|
|
Insurance.com |
-
Individual/Family/Student
- Small Business
- Dental Insurance |
| |
|
|
|