McCain vs Obama: Common Ground, Pt.1 – Reducing medical
cost; Mr. McCain’s objective.
With the stark differences highlighting the contrasts
between the two opposing candidates on health insurance/care
reform, it’s interesting to note some of the common causes.
The good people at Reuters have posted a very good article in
the Factbox section on their www.reuters.com/article site,
which illuminates some key areas where the two warring camps
do agree. Two of these areas noted by the Reuters team are:
spending “ too much on drugs and doctors” and “on what changes
to make.” How our nation’s health insurance/care reform should
implement these changes, however, is where the deep divide
begins. Taking a closer look at the two different health
insurance/care reform proposals will allow us to see the
commonality, apart from the differences.
As far as controlling how much is spent on ‘drugs and
doctors’, one estimate asserts that as much as 30% to 40 % of
medical spending is unnecessary, wasteful, even dangerous. The
take is that incentives to provide unnecessary care need to be
removed. So let’s consider Mr. McCain’s position first. It
appears that simplified formula is to:
1) Move everyone over to a new health insurance
bargain basement consumer-driven market of private health
insurance.
2) Cut the benefits to bare bones so that medical treatment
above the minimum is too expensive for most Americans.
3) Then those Americans will forego extra treatment that
they don’t really need.
The savings to health insurance providers could be
phenomenal. The next half of the equation is how to implement
these changes.
Continued…
|
|
|
InsureMe |
- Home, Life & Health
- Free Quotes
- Apply in Minutes |
| |
|
|
|
Insurance.com |
-
Individual/Family/Student
- Small Business
- Dental Insurance |
| |
|
|
|