What’s all this fighting about?, Pt.5 – Ugly Math, or just
abstract?
Previous…
Also, there is the risk of these victimized employers
turning around and ‘slashing’ paychecks to “compensate for
higher health insurance premiums. In the case of the
$171,428.57 employee, he stands to lose a lot. At $12,000 for
his family health insurance premiums he could find himself with
only $159,428.57 to live on for the entire year. The lucky
ones, of course are on the bottom. Those earning minimum wage
get a ‘free ride’ because their wages can’t be slashed and they
still can get health insurance.
Now comes the time for some advanced arithmetic. Two highly
educated individuals have put together some figures that seem
startling extreme. One is from the Harvard School of Public
Health, named Katherine Baicker. The other is with the
University of Michigan named Helen Levy. According to their
calculations, with a health insurance/care system styled after
the Massachusetts Model (which Mr. O draws heavily from) and
extended to a national level, a quarter-million poor people
will lose their jobs (health insurance, too?). The poor will be
the hardest hit. And after the millions of jobs the Bush
administration have already assisted in leaving the country,
even a quarter-million jobs is a significant portion of the
greatly-reduced job-pie.
Not being privy to the calculations, we must draw from the
few inferences we are given. We are given that $12,000 is 4% of
$300,000, which is no big deal. We are also given that $12,000
is 50% of $24,000. Ok, so far. What does this mean? Is the
inference that every employer will have to pay the National
Health Insurance Exchange $12,000 for every employee?
Continued…
|
|
|
InsureMe |
- Home, Life & Health
- Free Quotes
- Apply in Minutes |
| |
|
|
|
Insurance.com |
-
Individual/Family/Student
- Small Business
- Dental Insurance |
| |
|
|
|