Defining the Health Insurance/Care Chasm, Pt.1
There are a myriad of differences between the Democratic
and Republican candidates. Some of the important ones involve
proposed Health Insurance/Care Reform. These can be best
understood by viewing them from their fundamental ideologies.
They are so diverse as to be almost juxtaposed, pertaining to
our nation’s basic roll in the social responsibility of our
nation’s health. The basic philosophies of the Democrats is
that the health of any nation involves sharing risk. Our brave
warriors in the military understand this well, as they
understand that the wellbeing their individual units are part
of an integral whole. That, if they don’t share risk for one
another, the whole body falls into jeopardy. Pity we can’t all
be veterans, if for this wisdom alone. Health insurance is
also unique this way in its function in that, it becomes very
lame if it only caters to those who need it least. Without
risk-sharing, health insurance becomes just a luxury for the
select.
So herein lies the rub. As stated earlier, the Democrats
ideology is more directed toward the community at large, while
the Republican is more directed at individual freedom. In
support of community, the health insurance proposals of the
Democrats emphasize risk sharing between the healthy and the
sick. This is focused on the wellbeing of our nation as a
whole. Since much of what is conveyed is only in part, some of
the most meaningful information is lost in rhetoric and
deflection to obscurity. Although it may be premature to
outline a plan in full detail at this point, certain points of
concern rise quickly. These concerns can be addressed somewhat,
by defining more broad principles. It’s pretty easy to see that
the Republican’s direction is a radical move over to the
private health insurance market.
Continued…
|
|
|
InsureMe |
- Home, Life & Health
- Free Quotes
- Apply in Minutes |
| |
|
|
|
Insurance.com |
-
Individual/Family/Student
- Small Business
- Dental Insurance |
| |
|
|
|