Health Insurance Fear vs. Other Fears, Pt.8 –- Bipartisan
Reform?
Previous…
Because cost cutting is the prime source of $1 trillion of
the $1.1 trillion saved by Hacker's plan this remains a big
obstacle. Perhaps because of timing, neither Obama nor Clinton
have elaborated on how their health insurance/care plans will
adequately control costs. While it’s true they will see some
savings from administrative efficiencies and more
cost-effective care, the savings would be comparatively minor.
They have also left it unclear about what employers would have
to pay in lieu of providing health insurance/care, though a 7%
cap has been suggested. At this point in the campaign they
have both advanced to the point of embracing the politically
savvy part of Hacker's plan, but have chosen to hold off on
announcing methods of serious cost controls. All must realize
the grueling process of reckoning with the insurance industry
and trying to get anything through Congress while preserving a
vestige of the original objective. If too many colors run
together, we could be left with mud. The health insurance/care
system we’re left with may degenerate to one “very much like
the current one, just with more subsidies for coverage and
more clearly structured [health] insurance choices, but with
relentless cost increases that translate into reduced actual
care,” as Ezra Klein puts it.
With all this, it should be noted that Hacker’s health
insurance/care plan is not the only game in town. Even though
“versions of his plan are getting the most attention at the
presidential level, in Congress, the action is around the
Healthy Americans Act sponsored by Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon”,
Klein introspects. This health insurance/care plan is
structured very differently.
Continued…
|
|
|
InsureMe |
- Home, Life & Health
- Free Quotes
- Apply in Minutes |
| |
|
|
|
Insurance.com |
-
Individual/Family/Student
- Small Business
- Dental Insurance |
| |
|
|
|