Nationalized Health Care, Pt1 -- Not Democrats
The Chicago Tribune has posted a very-much-needed article
in response to the charge of McCain and so many other
detractors that the “Democrats will dismantle health care as
Americans now know it if they gain the presidency”. This
presumptive sway suggests that “employee health insurance and
private insurance are going away” is very misleading and in
need of correction. Much of this effort for this article was
taken on and delivered by Kevin Freking, of the Associated
Press. This is a very hot issue and becoming a feature
response from Mr. McCain’s camp. As Kevin keenly points out,
this is simply not the case. The Tribune points out that
“Neither Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) nor Sen. Hillary Clinton
(D-N.Y.) would do away with the current system under which
most Americans – 158 million people under the age of 65 --
receive health insurance through their employers.” Both Barack
and Hillary realize that the general public would not take
such a leap. The public would not be willing to just trash the
only system they've always known and depend on so much. To
suggest so would be totally out of touch.
The great American dissatisfaction is not with employee
health insurance, but with the soaring medical costs. In fact,
the Democrats both want to strengthen our employer-based
system. Two of the ways they would do this are with subsidies
for small companies to help them offer employee health
insurance to their small number of employees. The larger
employers would either have to offer benefits or else feed the
system so it can. Obama's campaign policy director, Heather
Higginbottom explains “We don’t eliminate the employer-based
side of the equation. We don’t dismantle private insurance,”
as quoted in Kevin’s article.
To be continued…
|
|
|
InsureMe |
- Home, Life & Health
- Free Quotes
- Apply in Minutes |
| |
|
|
|
Insurance.com |
-
Individual/Family/Student
- Small Business
- Dental Insurance |
| |
|
|
|