Daily News Updates - Health Insurance News

Destitute vs. McCain, Pt.1 – Too expensive ; Not viable ; Flawed stats.

Previous…

So, let’s hear from our national community. In our recently-evolved societal structure, it has worked well to separate blogs into categories, based on: Opinion; Testimony or; Attributable reliable evidence. Our first contributor was signed on as ‘netguy’. He has a testimony which allows us to ‘wear his shoes’ and decide for ourselves how Mr. McCain’s health insurance plan would effect him and his family. He had been laid off and, presumably, had lost family health insurance. Being wise, this person realized the importance of obtaining family health insurance soon. As ‘netguy’ explains: “My wife and [were] two healthy, skinny people barely past 30 and we were turned down by all 8 companies we applied to.”

Eventually, they were able to obtain health insurance, but it was very expensive and only offered coverage with very high deductibles. His final analysis was noting that, the health insurers write their one-sided contracts and “simply won’t deal with individuals”.

The next one comes from a well-known contributor to our health/wellbeing community who general responds to all three of these categories, signed in as ‘Wendell Murray’. The content provided here seems to lean toward opinion, well-worth considering (no endorsements are implied). He provides his over-all summary of Mr. McCain’s health insurance proposal. Since his writings typically do reflect all three categories with greater length and depth, it’s natural to expect his summary is well-thought out. His opinions is: “Anyone lacking bias or funding from vested interests with a minimal amount of knowledge can debunk the nonsense of any healthcare-related proposal from Senator McCain or his campaign.”

Now comes a third category statement. Again, this article takes no sides. Signed on as ‘webguy2’ this person states that “Norvax” is not an authority. Their business is selling ‘quote engines’ to health insurance agents. Depending on one’s trust in that company’s statistical abilities, disciplines and ethics, the reader must judge for themselves the integrity of their findings.

Continued…
October News...