No Right to Adequate & Affordable, Pt.1 – ‘Adequate’ or
‘affordable’, but not both.
Previous...
Mr.
Reinhardt now turns his attention to Mr. McCain who,
apparently, believes that Americans do not have the right to
adequate and affordable health insurance/care any more then
they have to a new Mercedes. So Mr. Reinhardt explains his
view that Mr. McCain’s plan will leave Americans still in want
and will also undermine our nation’s mainstay. That is, the
employer-based health insurance system. By switching the tax
mechanism, employers will lose the incentive of offering health
insurance benefits altogether.
This suits
Mr. McCain just fine. He would rather that our nation abandon
this mainstay and try their luck in the free market. There is
no mention of ‘casino rules’, where the dealer always wins ties
and the health insurance industry always gets to write the
contract. What’s in the contract? Adequacy of the coverage,
OR NOT. Read the fine print, if you’re an attorney. Adequate
health insurance is never mentioned by John McCain. For most
of America, adequacy and affordability will become mutually
exclusive (Choose only one from the list). You can’t have them
both.
By
‘nullifying’ the state-level consumer protections, Mr. McCain
rightly predicts competition will increase and health insurance
premium costs will go down for a few people.
Now the
health insurance industry will be able to ‘cherry-pick’ their
preferred customers and reject the rest. The young and healthy
will be lured away from the risk-sharing pools of
employer-based plans in favor of the cheaper private individual
plans (of course). When this happens, only the more risky
Americans who are not young and not in perfect health any more
will remain.
Continued…
October News...
|
|
|
InsureMe |
- Home, Life & Health
- Free Quotes
- Apply in Minutes |
| |
|
|
|
Insurance.com |
-
Individual/Family/Student
- Small Business
- Dental Insurance |
| |
|
|
|