The Real Problem of Covering the ‘Uninsured’, Pt.10 – Less
cost and better health.
Previous…
‘Free-riding’ refers to those who have no health insurance
(voluntary or otherwise), just show up at the ER for
non-emergencies to get the ‘free’ (but very costly)
‘safety-net’ medical treatment provided for by law (when
someone has no health insurance). Certain groups of medical
treatment providers have been thriving on this loophole for
years and still very much are. Once it was established that
everyone was mandated to have their own health insurance, it
was deemed that there was no excuse for anyone showing up at
the ER for non-emergencies any more. Neither was there further
need to continue funding this very inefficient and costly
practice.
The savings started rolling in forthright. The state
implemented a schedule to stop funding all these ‘safety-net’
providers. Of course, there was much whimpering by the few
medical providers who had getting rich from all this and they
immediately launched their own anti-campaign to try and defeat
the whole universal health insurance/care initiative. But the
State of Massachusetts had already anticipated this resistance
and had resolved to see it through. The savings were
substantial and the first major objective of the Massachusetts
health insurance/care model was deemed a success.
As far as tangible health benefits, there turned out to be a
spectro-benefit. There were immediate medical benefit results
but, perhaps, the greatest success is the spawning of an
ever-blossoming healthy population. On the proactive side of
things, it was expected that this, alone, could prove to become
the single-most important benefit of the whole universal health
insurance/care philosophy.
Continued…
|
|
|
InsureMe |
- Home, Life & Health
- Free Quotes
- Apply in Minutes |
| |
|
|
|
Insurance.com |
-
Individual/Family/Student
- Small Business
- Dental Insurance |
| |
|
|
|