The Real Problem of Covering the ‘Uninsured’, Pt.9 –
Effective results of a working model.
Previous…
One of the ‘scare tactics’ was that everyone in
Massachusetts would dump their current, expensive private
health insurance and flock over to the cheaper and better
government-sponsored and regulated health insurance plans. Not
only did that effect never materialize, but it turned out that
Massachusetts actually performed better than all of the other
states for growth in the private health insurance sector. In
fact, it was the only state of all 50 which had positive
growth.
One of the remaining challenges, which was anticipated, was
cost and efficiency. Again, because of the unprecedented move
to mandate universal health insurance/care, it was necessary to
wait for the settling to stabilize in order to assess both the
extent and the remedy. Remedy solutions are now being
implemented. Three of the parameters that were expected to be
problems were popular rejection and non-compliance to acquiring
health insurance, tangible cost savings and tangible health
benefits.
Acceptance and compliance were so high that accelerated
participation caused funding strain. As the program advanced
more rapidly than the funding schedule was adjusted for (part
of the reason was that existing conditions were even worse that
had been realized). The new general attitude that has emerged
seemed a little perplexing at first. Many of the more than
600,000 who formerly had no health insurance now have an inner
satisfaction and security that they are no longer ‘beggars’ but
and justify demanding health care.
Tangible cost savings for the health insurance/care model
were realized when the first major objective was reached. This
was the problem of what Mitt Romney referred to as
‘free-riding’.
Continued…
|
|
|
InsureMe |
- Home, Life & Health
- Free Quotes
- Apply in Minutes |
| |
|
|
|
Insurance.com |
-
Individual/Family/Student
- Small Business
- Dental Insurance |
| |
|
|
|