Health-Care Contrasts, Pt.4 – Win / win, or no deal.
Previous…
But, owing that big industry sees the writing on the wall;
they realize that something must be done about the nationwide
threat of the impending health insurance crises. So they are
working with Congress to find a workable resolve. Leaders of
the health insurance industry explain that they cannot support
a one-sided approach at the cost of their own demise, but they
can work with a ‘supporting all’ approach in the broader sense.
The rub is that, if they offer policies to just anyone, they be
left only with those who have the greatest expenses. People who
don’t have expenses will not take out policies. So the hapless
health insurance provider would end up paying out far more than
they were taking in.
So, in the interest of fairness (and any chance of success),
the formidable health insurance industry will consider covering
‘just anyone’ as long as ‘just anyone’ mandates ‘everyone’.
They must balance their risk in order to survive. And survive,
they will. Their power and influence on these health insurance
issues is almost too scary to think about. The wise survivors
in Congress have never questioned this.
To bring all this back to the Obama perspective, it should
noted that the general public has always been shy of extreme
changes, even if they agree with them. The Obama / Hillary
debate wasn’t so much about the ‘mandate all’ question as it
was about who could take on McCain. Obama took on the less
extreme approach of not mandating health insurance for all
adults. His platform was simply to provide ‘affordable’
coverage so that all could get it, if they choose.
Continued…
|
|
|
InsureMe |
- Home, Life & Health
- Free Quotes
- Apply in Minutes |
| |
|
|
|
Insurance.com |
-
Individual/Family/Student
- Small Business
- Dental Insurance |
| |
|
|
|