Health-Care Contrasts, Pt.6 – Similar cost, very different
outcome.
Previous…
In order for the health insurance industry to even consider
a mandate to cover all of the ‘uninsurable’ they stand firm on
their demand of a mandate of ‘all citizens’, including the
healthy to acquire health insurance. Mr. Obama is not committed
to this mandate yet, though it’s almost certain to be an
important element in future negotiations with ‘big health
insurance’. The Wyden Proposal, Pioneered by Senator Ted
Kennedy, is already geared up for this issue.
As far as the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center’s report, Mr.
Obama's health insurance plan would cost $1.6 trillion over 10
years. They project that Mr. McCain's health insurance plan
would cost almost as much. They predict his plan would cost
about $1.3 trillion over the same time span. Neither proposal
is expected to substantially reduce health care costs.
The McCain plan, appears to be geared more toward those who
already have health insurance. His plan would mostly benefit
the wealthy by giving them better choices while not raising
their taxes. It must be noted that, at this point, there are
still too many ‘preliminary vagaries’ in both plans to make
comprehensive predictions. This is true for both: The Tax
Policy Center’s report and that of the Health Affairs Journal
report.
One thing is very clear, however from the proposals. They do
contrast very sharply from one another as far as what voters
should expect. Though Obama’s plan projects universal coverage,
it may fall short by 26%, but will eclipse Mr. McCain’s plan on
this issue. Mr. McCain’s plan is expected to seriously
challenge today's conventional employer-based health insurance
system, presently providing coverage for 170 million Americans.
Continued…
|
|
|
InsureMe |
- Home, Life & Health
- Free Quotes
- Apply in Minutes |
| |
|
|
|
Insurance.com |
-
Individual/Family/Student
- Small Business
- Dental Insurance |
| |
|
|
|