Bush’s Report Card, Pt.4 – How can they call it ‘a forward
economy’?
Previous…
Suppose we have 99 people earning $40 thousand a year and 1
person earning $100 million annually (some do). (All with
health insurance, by the way.) The median (average) wage here
is $1,039,600. Now say that 7 out of the first 99 all lose
their jobs while the rest, including the millionaire remain
employed. Those 7 get new jobs, but their new pay is only one
quarter of what it was (now $10,000). They’re only being paid
25% of what their pay once was. But, because the millionaire
didn’t lose his/her job, the median pay is still $1,037,500.
Almost no change in the median ($2,100 drop, on average), even
though 7% of the people are severely hurting. Each of those 7
has lost $30,000. If this was 7% of our nation’s work force of,
say 100 million workers that experienced this, than around 7
million Americans could have been reduced to only one quarter
of their former salary. Would we expect those 7 million to
still have health insurance? Or would they simply join the
growing number of Americans with no health insurance? That may
be the the case here.
The census doesn’t elaborate, but it does imply that the
filthy rich did not take the brunt of the layoffs and those who
did, were hit hard. Other sources indicate that the average pay
for the millions who had to find new jobs because of
international out-sourcing, was reduced to around 25% of what
those people had been earning before the layoffs. It’s
interesting to note that 7.2 million Americans have, actually,
lost their health insurance, according to the census. The deca-million
group without health insurance keeps swelling and we wonder
why?
Continued…
|
|
|
InsureMe |
- Home, Life & Health
- Free Quotes
- Apply in Minutes |
| |
|
|
|
Insurance.com |
-
Individual/Family/Student
- Small Business
- Dental Insurance |
| |
|
|
|