Daily News Updates - Health Insurance News

Sensible Definition of ‘Best Coverage’, Pt.2 – Insensible thinking.

Previous…

There are many who strongly believe these people don’t deserve health insurance at all and should ‘rott’ (dying is fine). Gray area, perhaps. But what isn’t a gray area is ‘throwing the baby out with the bathwater’. When someone touts: ‘We should ignore all of those 45.7 million Americans without health insurance, simply because some of them may be older and smoke, there is something seriously wrong with that person’s morality! When people brush the crises under the carpet by bad-mouthing ‘big government’ and then ignore the whole crises, there is also a glaring problem with those peoples’ sensibilities’. This is exactly Jonathan’s point. Is the crises centered on those doing fine or about the destitute with no health insurance because of chronic or preexisting medical conditions? What about autism, MS, MD, diabetes, etc? Are we justified to ignore them because of the smokers?

Are we more concerned about a few doctors going bankrupt because of malpractice suits than millions of Americans who have health insurance, but get sick and are driven into bankruptcy who aren’t members of our country club? Issues, issues, issues! Crises, crises, crises. Focus, focus focus! Mr. Beckley is asking the upright to identify themselves. He realizes the harm and damage of extreme selfishness. He, for one, is willing to stand up and be part of the solution, sacrificing of himself to heal a blight of our nation. He doesn’t mind paying higher taxes for the right reasons. He brings out some of the most sensible points you’ll find, including one health insurance/care scenario that makes so much sense it’s scary to think about:

Continued…